Wednesday, 14 October 2009

BBC: What happened to Global Warming?

At last we are seeing someone from the MSM deviate from the path of reporting man made climate change as stone cold fact. The BBC's Climate correspondent, Paul Hudson, asks: "What happened to Global Warming?" Apparently this article has been the "most viewed" on the BBC News site for the last three days.

Paul writes:
This headline may come as a bit of a surprise, so too might that fact that the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998.

But it is true. For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.

And our climate models did not forecast it, even though man-made carbon dioxide, the gas thought to be responsible for warming our planet, has continued to rise.

So what on Earth is going on?

Climate change sceptics, who passionately and consistently argue that man's influence on our climate is overstated, say they saw it coming.

They argue that there are natural cycles, over which we have no control, that dictate how warm the planet is. But what is the evidence for this?

During the last few decades of the 20th Century, our planet did warm quickly.

Sceptics argue that the warming we observed was down to the energy from the Sun increasing. After all 98% of the Earth's warmth comes from the Sun.

But research conducted two years ago, and published by the Royal Society, seemed to rule out solar influences.

The scientists' main approach was simple: to look at solar output and cosmic ray intensity over the last 30-40 years, and compare those trends with the graph for global average surface temperature.

And the results were clear. "Warming in the last 20 to 40 years can't have been caused by solar activity," said Dr Piers Forster from Leeds University, a leading contributor to this year's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

But one solar scientist Piers Corbyn from Weatheraction, a company specialising in long range weather forecasting, disagrees.

He claims that solar charged particles impact us far more than is currently accepted, so much so he says that they are almost entirely responsible for what happens to global temperatures.

He is so excited by what he has discovered that he plans to tell the international scientific community at a conference in London at the end of the month.

If proved correct, this could revolutionise the whole subject.
Full article HERE.

Could this be the start of a long awaited, balanced discussion on climate change - and man's part in it?

4 comments:

IAlbion said...

Don't hold your breath,to many good jobs are at stake.

Gallimaufry said...

Calder and Svensmark's book "The Chilling Stars" convinced me that global warming is due to solar activity and cosmic waves and that AGM was hijacked to bash the capitalist West. Please read this Times article from 2007

JMT said...

Wish it would but since Governemtn tax revenues depend on it being FACT, I see no immediate resolution.

However it may be dawning on the dullards at the BBC that, if we follow the Green path to righteousness, unnecessary power usage must be abolished. A big electricity user like a publicly funded state broadcaster, which costs each family £142.50 pa, would obviously have to be number one on the list.

MMCC/AGW will die only when some legal eagle realises the size (£££'s) of the potential class actions against environmentalists for libelling every car-owner in the country.

Chinese Translator said...

We were just hit by two very strong storms two weeks ago. we never had that in decades. They left our country with still so many flooded areas, a lot were homeless and lost so many loved ones. The effect of those twin storm were devastating. And the news says its all because of global warming.