Showing posts with label liberty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label liberty. Show all posts

Thursday, 28 January 2010

Oi! FSA leave my bloody Cornflakes alone!

What I eat is up to me and me alone. Now thanks to our lovely Labour government I have to eat low salt Cornflakes. Did I, or any other customer ask for this change to the recipe? NO. Is this the Nanny state interfering in our lives again? YES.

Kellogg's have tried to hold out against reducing the salt in their cereals because of the taste that it provides. Thanks to the Food Standards Agency, we are going to be enjoying dull breakfasts because they think they know what is best for us. It really does make me effing sick.


God I bloody hate Labour.

Monday, 27 April 2009

Database - Jacqui Smith thinks it's OK to spy on us.

Forget civil liberties. Jacqui Smith believes that creating a mass database containing all of our electronic communication is a great idea. Her justification is that the database will make it easier for police and the security services to investigate crime and terrorism. And that's true. However, giving the police guns, and then allowing them to shoot anyone they think could be breaking the law would also make their job a lot easier, but that is clearly not the right thing to do.

Our communication details are already held by individual companies for 12 months, and they are available to the police on request. But that is not the same as a mass database under the control of the government. This is a massive step in the wrong direction. The next step in that direction would be to start recording the contents of our communications without having to worry about those silly civil liberty thingies.

Former Director of Public Prosecutions Sir Ken Macdonald said:
"This database would be an unimaginable hell house of personal private information. It would be a complete read-out of every citizen's life in the most intimate and demeaning detail."
Not only is this database an injury to our civil liberties, it will also be incredibly costly if this government's track record is anything to go by. Can you believe that at a time when we are all going to struggle, our idiotic government wants to waste billions of pounds of OUR money to spy on us? - They are totally clueless.

Saturday, 21 March 2009

Bailiffs really are Vampires, but Tom Harris is happy.

Tom Harris is a little surprised at the blogosphere's lack of interest over the announcement that the government are not going to allow the Bailiffs to kick our doors in (not just yet anyway). Is Tom suggesting that we should be applauding this move? Tom says: Labour denies bailiffs the right to enter property; blogscape refuses to notice.

I'm missing something here, Tom wants us to thank Labour for delaying illiberal proposal that THEY made as part of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act? How does piss off grab you Tom?

Oh, and did you know that under current law, bailiffs can only force entry if they have been previously invited into the house by the debtor - just like Vampires.

Oh, and one more thing - the only reason Jack Straw has put a stop to affront to liberty is that under the current economical climate it will lose Labour desperately needed votes.

Saturday, 28 February 2009

Convention on Modern Liberty - David Davis video.

Convention on Modern Liberty - 28th Feb 2009

The Convention on Modern Liberty will be a one day gathering of 1,000 people on Saturday 28 February 2009 at the Institute for Education in central London and as many again in the parallel regional and national meetings in Belfast, Bristol, Cambridge, Glasgow, Manchester, and Cardiff. It is being sponsored by Rowntrees, openDemocracy, Liberty and the Guardian.

From Anthony Barnett, Phil Booth, Shami Chakrabarti, Henry Porter, Stuart Weir:

We are entering a dangerous period in our country. Economic turmoil threatens profound hardship and disharmony. Disenchantment with politics is growing and even legitimate protest is threatened by an unprecedented programme of challenges to our rights, freedoms and democracy. Sixty years ago Britain was a proud co-author of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Now it is increasingly centralized, abandoning its historic principles some of which date back to the Magna Carta.

The Government’s continued stated determination to extend detention without charge in terrorism cases to 42 days is one symbol of the damage done to our hard-won rights and freedoms. The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA), which gives hundreds of agencies access to people’s records without their knowing, is another. The collection of all available records on a huge central database for the use of the authorities is a third.

We believe that such threats can be overcome but only if the public is woken to the dangers. While we may be impatient for action, the issues must be addressed in an open-minded way with as thorough and accessible public debate as possible.

Therefore we invite you to join a Convention on Modern Liberty. It will ask three broad questions:
Are our freedoms and rights threatened by an over-powerful state and if so how do we defend ourselves from this?

Are dangers to our security from terrorism and other threats, from climate change to pandemics being used to attack our rights, and how can we best defend ourselves?

How can we arouse sustained public interest?
We are making Modern Liberty a convention not a conference. We want to bring as many people together to see what common ground can be reached in defence of our freedoms. The Guardian is the main media partner. The Rowntree Reform and Charitable Trusts and the Rowntree Foundation are initial supporters. A wide range of organisations are joining the event from across the political spectrum.

Fundamental rights and freedoms are common to us all. The Universal Declaration recognises ‘the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family as the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world’. In Britain such values have an even longer history. We are indeed the inheritors of an inspiring tradition of liberty.

At the same time technical advances from information technology to explosives and the threats of catastrophic climatic change have altered the framework of power and fear.

This calls for a renewal of our democratic self-confidence. This is the purpose of the Convention on Modern Liberty. Whether you agree or not we hope you will join us to debate these issues.

Anthony Barnett (openDemocracy)
Phil Booth (NO2ID)
Shami Chakrabarti (Liberty)
Henry Porter (the Observer)
Stuart Weir (Democratic Audit)