I absolutely agree there is a problem – someone has just been near-fatally assaulted underneath that maypole in my small hometown.
I’m just observing that having to give ten year olds the 21st century version of a clip around the ear is, to me at least, a depressing necessity rather than an inspiring principle.
I agree. But what makes me proud is a senior Tory politician (possibly the next Home Secretary) saying that we have been far too soft.
There is one thing that Chris failed to mention, and that was the need (in the short term) for many more prison spaces. I think we will need less spaces (five to ten years) as the scrotes realise that we aren't going to put up with their crap any more.
Will any party be allowed to get tough on law and order, or will the civil servants in the Home Office water everything down that they have not negated by delay ?
How about romoving most of the 3000 laws labour have foisted upon us in the last 11 years as well as enforcing the ones we have properly before introducing any more new ones.
7 comments:
Brave words Steve. If he changed the shoulds and woulds into 'will' it might ring better.
Which bits in particular made you proud to be a Tory?
Gwen,
All of it.
If you don't think there is a problem then I suggest you get out more. Preferably beyond the Maypole on the village green.
I absolutely agree there is a problem – someone has just been near-fatally assaulted underneath that maypole in my small hometown.
I’m just observing that having to give ten year olds the 21st century version of a clip around the ear is, to me at least, a depressing necessity rather than an inspiring principle.
Gwen,
I agree. But what makes me proud is a senior Tory politician (possibly the next Home Secretary) saying that we have been far too soft.
There is one thing that Chris failed to mention, and that was the need (in the short term) for many more prison spaces. I think we will need less spaces (five to ten years) as the scrotes realise that we aren't going to put up with their crap any more.
Will any party be allowed to get tough on law and order, or will the civil servants in the Home Office water everything down that they have not negated by delay ?
How about romoving most of the 3000 laws labour have foisted upon us in the last 11 years as well as enforcing the ones we have properly before introducing any more new ones.
Sounds just like more soundbite politics to me.
Post a Comment