
Click to enlarge. (Yes I know the bell is Big Ben)
Author of the ground-breaking diet book: "The Eat Less Crap And Get Off Your Arse Diet"
JOHN Rentoul makes a good point about the Tories’/Spectator’s latest childish tactic of calling everyone they disagree with a liar. "Vulgar abuse", John calls it, and he’s right.Here is my comment on this:
I’ve been adopting far too liberal an approach to comment approval, even where the Tory liar line has been used, so I’m announcing a review. All existing comments which accuse anyone of lying will be deleted, and no future comments which do the same will be approved.
Use parliamentary protocol, people – there are ways of getting your point across without resort to childish name-calling.
Feckin’ eejits.
The dishonesty tag is working because it is true. And it hurts. Is there any point coming back here? What else will you ban? Is any criticism of Brown to be banned next? the government after that? then any criticism of the Labour party?Labour: if they don't like it, or if the truth causes embarrassment, they ban it. Tom, you just don't get blogging do you?
This is Labour all over, if you don’t like it you ban it, change the law, or just have those involved arrested on trumped up charges if all else fails.
You don’t get it, and that’s why you are going to lose, and BAD.
From PoliticsHome:
I think that these results are pretty conclusive. Lets hope Brown keeps up the lies - they are obviously doing Labour more damage than the Tories.
Sky are reporting that Unison are suspending payments to 64 constituency Labour parties. Unison give the labour party about £2m each year. This is a major blow to the Labour party and it could be just the first of many. The Union say they are angry over MPs expenses and the part privatisation of Royal Mail. General Secretary Dave Prentis said his union was "tired of feeding the hand that bites it".Gordon Brown sparked furious claims of a whitewash yesterday after ruling the inquiry into the Iraq War would be held in private.Even the the ridiculously pro-labour "Voice of the Mirror" has a go at Brown:
The long-awaited probe will be conducted by hand-picked grandees and will not report until after the next election.
And amazingly, Downing St admitted the toothless investigation would not even demand witnesses give evidence by law, and that its aim was not to "apportion blame".
The probe provoked fury among relatives of 179 troops who died and cries of "fix" from the opposition.
To hold the inquiry into the Iraq war in secret is another spectacular own goal by the Prime Minister.Is this the first sign of a split between Brown and The Mirror? Have they finally had enough of Brown's outrageous lies and deceit?
Gordon Brown has missed a valuable opportunity to begin the slow and painful process of rebuilding public confidence in politics.
We were cajoled and coerced into the most controversial of conflicts on what was at best reckless disinformation, at worst a blatant lie.
This war triggered the biggest demonstrations in recent history. So to handpick four knights and a baroness to peruse documents behind closed doors is an insult, a charade to inflame contempt instead of healing wounds.
Faith in politicians was eroded by the Iraq invasion, and fell off a cliff over MPs' expenses. Mr Brown yesterday fuelled the cynicism.
We are still waiting for that full public inquiry into the Iraq war.
I think I've worked out what Gordon Brown's legacy will be. He's always been a spinner who has surrounded himself with back stabbers, but he's upped his game recently. He's gone from the nasty bit of spin and smear to full blown lies and deceit. So I'm going to remember him not as a loser, or a ditherer, or back stabber, or a spinner, or a smear spreader, or a bottler, or as an incompetent arse - no, I will remember Gordon Brown as a bloody liar.
Well done John, that will calm things down - not.Can you believe it?
We've had the most disastrous results affected by the recession, allowances scandals and ministerial resignations, including Cabinet members walking out the day before the election and as soon as the polls closed. All for maximum publicity.
Then came the PLP debate where Charles Clarke's demand for GB to go were overwhelmingly rejected. Instead we all backed calls for unity and getting on with Government.
So imagine my surprise when I was walking through Portcullis House in the House of Commons on Thursday and stumbled upon a meeting held by Charles Clarke, John Reid, Alan Milburn and a few others, huddled together in intense discussion.
I went over and offered to be the secretary for their little club. With nervous laughter, my offer was turned down.
I later saw David Miliband and Milburn in a similar intense discussion. My suspicions were now heightened.
These may not be connected but now I read today that Charles Clarke is once again calling for another challenge against Gordon at the next party conference.
* Schools: Brown is planning to take £3.6 billion out of education spending, the equivalent of losing 30,891 teachers, and 24,140 teaching assistants and school support staff.Mr Pope, who has a majority of 5,587, said serving his constituents had been a "privilege" and described his pride at being a Labour member.
His resignation announcement did not mention recent rows over expenses and the party leadership, but did detail his pride in serving in "Tony Blair's government" following the 1997 election victory.
"You may have forgotten us, but come the next Election, we will not forget you!"When it becomes available, I will post the link to tonight's programme.


Yesterday at PMQs Gordon Brown took great pleasure in crowing about Conservative spending cuts for 2011 onwards. He was jubilant when he pointed out that Andrew Lansley had let "the cat out of the bag" by announcing that the Conservatives would cut spending across most departments by 10% to protect spending on Health. What Brown failed to point out is that these are Labours spending plans adjusted by the Conservatives in favour of Health."Between now and 2013/14, public spending will rise by £86bn but if we make a series of very difficult choices on, for example, tax and, for example, on efficiencies, we can halve the budget deficit over the course of five years."So there you have it. Not only are they going to cut spending (according to their own budget figures), they are also going to increase our taxes to repay the massive amount of debt that they have piled upon the nation. And don't be fooled by the "spending will rise by £86bn" that does not include inflation or interest payment on debts (that's were the 7% cut figure comes from).

We are, by all accounts (including some Labour MPs) going to see some truly disastrous European election results for Labour tonight. I've outlined HERE how they are going to be able to use the UKIP protest vote to wriggle out of blaming themselves and Brown for their poor performance. The line being used (already) is that they are taking more than their fair share of the blame for the expenses scandal.
Gordon Brown has hung on to power with what can only be described as pathetic desperation. The flood of people deserting the sinking ship has been incredible to see. The Local election results have been disastrous, totally wiping out Labour across the entire country. And yet Gordon Brown hangs on - shamelessly leading his party to a crushing defeat that could be avoided if he could put his party before himself.Labour party members no longer have confidence in Gordon Brown's leadership - according to an exclusive poll carried out by Channel 4 News.
In a damning verdict on the prime minister - a majority think he should step down before the next election - and more than one in five think he should go now.
Two thirds believe Mr Brown isn't able to communicate his ideas effectively to the public - and almost half think he is weak and indecisive.
The survey also reveals the impact of the expenses crisis - Mr Brown's approval rating has plummeted from 77 per cent in February to just 54 per cent today.
That gives him the worst performance ratings in Cabinet - the only ministers with lower scores were James Purnell and Jacqui Smith - and both of them have now resigned. But there is good news for the man widely tipped as the next Labour leader - Alan Johnson - comes top - with an approval rating of 75 per cent.
Labour members are not impressed with the way Mr Brown has dealt with the expenses crisis either. In the survey - just one in four think he is done better than his rival party leaders - David Cameron and Nick Clegg.
And in common with the wider electorate - the scandal has put them off politicians in general - with half of party members saying none of the leaders has handled it well.
There is no comfort for the prime minister when it comes to his leadership qualities.
Most of the members think he should have sacked Jacqui Smith and Hazel Blears over their expenses earlier - before they took matters into their own hands and resigned.
And less than half think reshuffling the Cabinet will do anything to strengthen the Government.
In fact - 53 per cent think the party would be better off if Tony Blair was still leader.
When it comes to a potential successor - Alan Johnson comes top of the poll - with 35 per cent - well ahead of the second choice - David Miliband, on just 12 per cent.
But just a handful of party members believe either man could lead Labour to victory in the next general election: although slightly more believe it's possible, although unlikely, for Labour to win under Mr Johnson.
And although Alistair Darling is still seen as a better Chancellor than Ed Balls - almost half of Labour members do not know - or want a different chancellor altogether. YouGov contacted some 800 Labour party members around the country for the poll - which was carried out in the wake of Thursday's local and European elections.
Gordon Brown looks to have bottled it again. I think it was a poorly kept secret that he wanted to replace Darling with his mate Balls. Well it looks like Darling, one of the mildest men in Government has told Brown where he can stick it and Brown has backed down. Pathetic. Is that the man running our country? He's having to bribe people to save his political neck.“We both love the Labour Party. I have worked for it for 20 years and you for far longer. We know we owe it everything and it owes us nothing. I owe it to our party to say what I believe no matter how hard that may be. I now believe your continued leadership makes a Conservative victory more not less likely.UPDATE: It's now 06:35 and I've been following the situation all night at work. I should be going to bed, but I'm staying up to watch history unfold. Not only does it look like Labour are going to suffer a crushing defeat in the local elections, but Gordon Brown is now facing a serious revolt and must re-shuffle immediately. There a few significant factors to consider this morning. Of all those coming out in support of Brown last night, we did not hear from Harman or Darling - either failing to give their support for Brown this morning will mean a definite end to Brown's premiership. Darling is likely to be unimpressed with being forced out of his job to be replaced by Brown's mate Balls. Also - where are Hoon and Mandleson?
“The Party was here long before us, and we want it to be here long after we have gone. We must do the right thing by it.
“We need to show that we are prepared to fight to be a credible government and have the courage to offer an alternative future. I am therefore calling on you to stand aside to give our party a fighting chance of winning.
“My actions are my own considered view, nothing more. If the consensus is that you should continue, then I will support the Government loyally from the backbenches. But I do believe that this question now needs to be put.”
Sky have got hold of the email that's prepared to ask Gordon Brown to go. This comes after news that Blunkett has turned Brown down for a Cabinet position:Dear Gordon,
Over the last 12 years in government, and before, you have made an enormous contribution to this country and to the Labour Party, and this is very widely acknowledged.
However we are writing now because we believe that in the current political situation, you can best serve the Labour Party and the country by stepping down as party leader and prime minister, and so allowing the party to choose a new leader to take us into the next general election.
Yours,
XXXX
I can't say I share Iain Dale's opinion of Jacqui Smith and I'm more than a little pleased that she stepping down as Home secretary. I'm a little fed up that she was allowed to step down when she should have been sacked a long time ago. She led he department through a number of cock-ups and cover-ups. Cover-ups which led to the arrest of Damien Green after receiving leaked documents which embarrassed Jacqui. She shit on the police by totally ignoring the pay arbitration they went through together. She pushed on forty two days detention when it was obviously an attack on civil liberties, she abused the expenses system to line her pockets (and then there's the porn). This list goes on.